🔍 Review Process

At Neurogrammind Journal, we are committed to ensuring a fair, rigorous, and transparent peer review process. All submitted manuscripts undergo the following steps:

1. Initial Editorial Screening

Once a manuscript is submitted, it is first evaluated by the editorial team to ensure:

• Compliance with submission guidelines

• Relevance to the journal’s scope

• Absence of plagiarism or unethical content
  If the manuscript passes this stage, it proceeds to peer review.

2. Peer Review Assignment

• Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts in the relevant field.

• The review is conducted under a double-blind system: reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other.

3. Review Evaluation

Reviewers are asked to evaluate:

• Scientific validity and originality

• Clarity of methodology and results

• Relevance to the field of neuropsychology, linguistics, or brain sciences

• Ethical considerations
  They may recommend one of the following:

• Accept as is

• Minor Revision

• Major Revision

• Reject

4. Editorial Decision

Based on the reviewers’ feedback, the editorial board will:

• Communicate the decision to the author

• Provide reviewer comments and guidance for revisions if needed

5. Revisions (if applicable)

• Authors are given a timeline to submit the revised manuscript.

• Revisions may be re-evaluated by the same reviewers.

6. Final Decision and Acceptance

• After satisfactory revision, the manuscript is accepted for publication.

• Authors will be notified and will proceed to the production phase (copyediting and layout).

⏳ Estimated Timeline

Stage Duration

Initial Screening 3–15 working days

Peer Review 2–4 weeks

Revision (if needed) 1–3 weeks

Final Decision 1–2 weeks

✅ Ethical Review

We strictly adhere to the ethical guidelines of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). All submissions involving human participants must include proper ethical approval and informed consent.